Minnesota's 1st Congressional District: Martin precincts
Precinct results
"(part)" marks a precinct only partly inside this district; its full vote is shown.
| Precinct | 2024 President | 2022 Governor | 2020 President | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margin | Votes | Margin | Votes | Margin | Votes | |
| 0005 | R+46.5 | 142 | R+45.9 | 109 | R+43.1 | 130 |
| 0010 | R+62.9 | 124 | R+57.4 | 108 | R+64.5 | 124 |
| 0015 | R+56.1 | 157 | R+34.1 | 132 | R+37.6 | 173 |
| 0020 | R+49.4 | 81 | R+38.5 | 52 | R+50.0 | 80 |
| 0025 | R+56.9 | 167 | R+57.2 | 152 | R+60.0 | 180 |
| 0030 | R+26.5 | 117 | R+31.2 | 93 | R+16.4 | 110 |
| 0035 | R+30.7 | 625 | R+32.9 | 513 | R+34.5 | 664 |
| 0040 | R+23.9 | 873 | R+25.6 | 715 | R+25.1 | 892 |
| 0050 | R+21.2 | 652 | R+19.6 | 511 | R+19.0 | 689 |
| 0055 | R+33.5 | 837 | R+34.9 | 642 | R+35.9 | 853 |
| 0065 | R+16.8 | 495 | R+8.6 | 349 | R+13.4 | 499 |
| 0070 | R+21.2 | 553 | R+24.5 | 396 | R+22.5 | 565 |
| 0080 | R+43.9 | 551 | R+43.2 | 398 | R+37.5 | 590 |
| 0085 | R+36.3 | 520 | R+41.0 | 349 | R+31.8 | 509 |
| 0095 | R+37.0 | 184 | R+46.3 | 147 | R+47.2 | 193 |
| 0100 | R+43.4 | 182 | R+41.3 | 160 | R+40.8 | 169 |
| 0105 | R+58.1 | 160 | R+59.4 | 128 | R+63.5 | 167 |
| 0110 | R+56.4 | 133 | R+50.5 | 103 | R+38.3 | 133 |
| 0115 | R+53.3 | 152 | R+36.6 | 134 | R+40.4 | 146 |
| 0120 | R+63.6 | 173 | R+58.5 | 142 | R+54.2 | 166 |
| 0125 | R+52.7 | 112 | R+52.8 | 89 | R+52.7 | 112 |
| 0130 | R+67.4 | 95 | R+48.7 | 78 | R+53.8 | 104 |
| 0135 | R+46.0 | 215 | R+44.5 | 164 | R+43.2 | 227 |
| 0140 | R+57.7 | 130 | R+54.1 | 98 | R+54.9 | 122 |
| 0145 | R+38.3 | 128 | R+27.9 | 86 | R+41.5 | 123 |
| 0150 | R+40.0 | 30 | R+37.9 | 29 | R+43.8 | 32 |
| 0155 | R+63.2 | 155 | R+67.5 | 117 | R+56.7 | 141 |
| 0160 | R+41.8 | 146 | R+50.8 | 118 | R+34.8 | 161 |
| 0165 | R+45.2 | 250 | R+56.8 | 199 | R+52.3 | 260 |
| 0170 | R+47.7 | 593 | R+37.6 | 436 | R+47.8 | 571 |
| 0175 | R+54.9 | 308 | R+52.1 | 261 | R+54.6 | 315 |
| 0180 | R+61.9 | 139 | R+55.9 | 118 | R+52.3 | 151 |
| 0185 | R+37.0 | 378 | R+32.4 | 309 | R+39.3 | 394 |
| 0195 | R+43.3 | 556 | R+36.8 | 405 | R+44.5 | 591 |
| 0200 | R+37.5 | 120 | R+36.1 | 97 | R+32.8 | 116 |
| 0205 | R+52.1 | 399 | R+44.7 | 302 | R+44.2 | 387 |
| 0210 | R+70.1 | 164 | R+63.0 | 135 | R+62.9 | 170 |
2024 President (Kamala D. Harris and Tim Walz vs. Donald J. Trump and JD Vance). Source: Minnesota Secretary of State, election results media files (all races by precinct, aggregated to county). Official canvassed results, Minnesota Secretary of State (State Canvassing Board certified).
2022 Governor (Tim Walz and Peggy Flanagan vs. Scott Jensen and Matt Birk). Source: Minnesota Secretary of State, election results media files (all races by precinct, aggregated to county). Official canvassed results, Minnesota Secretary of State (State Canvassing Board certified).
2020 President (Joseph R. Biden and Kamala Harris vs. Donald J. Trump and Michael R. Pence). Source: Minnesota Secretary of State, election results media files (all races by precinct, aggregated to county). Official canvassed results, Minnesota Secretary of State (State Canvassing Board certified).
Precinct demographics
Demographics are Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2020-2024 5-year estimates for block groups, assigned to precincts by area share. They describe the resident population, not registered or likely voters, and include non-citizens. ACS margins of error are not shown; small precincts carry large error. Area weighting assumes people are spread evenly within each block group, so large rural precincts are the least reliable. Median income is a household-weighted average of block-group medians, an approximation.
| Precinct | Population | Voting-age pop. | % White non-Hisp. | % Hispanic | % Black | % Asian | Median income* | % Bachelor's+ | % 18-29 (of adults) | % 65+ | % Homeowners | % Below poverty | % Spanish at home (adults) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Twp | 221 | 161 | 95.9% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | $89k | 24.6% | 15.3% | 22.1% | 82.1% | 3.9% | 0.8% |
| Center Creek Twp | 357 | 281 | 89.4% | 8.6% | 0.2% | 0.0% | $79k | 11.8% | 15.5% | 23.6% | 90.6% | 14.0% | 1.5% |
| Ceylon | 5 | 4 | 88.8% | 4.9% | 3.0% | 0.0% | $48k | 13.6% | 14.2% | 33.8% | 74.8% | 9.8% | 0.5% |
| Dunnell | 2 | 1 | 89.1% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 0.0% | $48k | 13.8% | 13.7% | 33.9% | 73.8% | 9.8% | 0.8% |
| East Chain Twp | 296 | 226 | 97.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.1% | $86k | 24.9% | 18.8% | 21.4% | 79.5% | 6.7% | 0.3% |
| Elm Creek Twp | 179 | 147 | 97.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | $90k | 24.3% | 15.6% | 24.6% | 88.9% | 4.9% | 0.0% |
| Fairmont Twp | 695 | 553 | 88.4% | 2.3% | 4.6% | 0.1% | $40k | 9.6% | 13.3% | 35.0% | 41.7% | 38.6% | 0.5% |
| Fairmont W-1 P-1 | 437 | 366 | 92.2% | 4.2% | 1.4% | 0.0% | $72k | 43.9% | 10.1% | 32.4% | 69.6% | 7.8% | 0.9% |
| Fairmont W-1 P-2 | 1,831 | 1,449 | 94.4% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 3.0% | $70k | 39.6% | 3.6% | 35.6% | 65.1% | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| Fairmont W-2 P-1 | 1,034 | 863 | 92.1% | 6.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | $81k | 36.4% | 15.8% | 20.2% | 88.0% | 5.9% | 1.5% |
| Fairmont W-2 P-2 | 1,270 | 1,015 | 95.8% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.9% | $53k | 27.1% | 7.4% | 31.2% | 72.6% | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| Fairmont W-3 P-1 | 652 | 516 | 74.2% | 18.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $58k | 20.4% | 24.4% | 12.5% | 68.1% | 5.3% | 13.0% |
| Fairmont W-3 P-2 | 1,208 | 962 | 78.0% | 13.5% | 1.9% | 0.0% | $48k | 14.8% | 20.6% | 20.6% | 56.1% | 18.7% | 8.9% |
| Fairmont W-4 P-1 | 687 | 477 | 73.6% | 24.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | $55k | 23.8% | 26.6% | 23.0% | 52.8% | 10.3% | 13.4% |
| Fairmont W-4 P-2 | 1,447 | 1,111 | 77.9% | 15.3% | 1.5% | 0.0% | $37k | 7.1% | 20.5% | 16.9% | 48.8% | 21.8% | 6.8% |
| Fox Lake Twp | 459 | 366 | 88.0% | 9.4% | 0.1% | 0.6% | $64k | 22.7% | 18.9% | 26.7% | 76.1% | 11.4% | 6.6% |
| Fraser Twp | 343 | 267 | 96.9% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.2% | $88k | 19.8% | 12.4% | 25.2% | 87.9% | 8.4% | 2.5% |
| Galena Twp | 456 | 351 | 89.9% | 8.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | $66k | 23.8% | 19.9% | 27.5% | 73.7% | 9.4% | 5.2% |
| Granada | 7 | 5 | 89.4% | 8.6% | 0.1% | 0.0% | $79k | 11.9% | 15.5% | 23.5% | 90.6% | 14.0% | 1.5% |
| Jay Twp | 279 | 208 | 94.0% | 2.1% | 0.1% | 0.5% | $99k | 30.2% | 18.2% | 21.1% | 89.2% | 5.6% | 2.4% |
| Lake Belt Twp | 400 | 316 | 89.0% | 4.9% | 2.9% | 0.0% | $49k | 13.8% | 14.2% | 33.5% | 74.9% | 9.7% | 0.5% |
| Lake Fremont Twp | 402 | 317 | 89.1% | 4.9% | 2.9% | 0.0% | $50k | 14.1% | 14.2% | 33.3% | 75.1% | 9.7% | 0.5% |
| Manyaska Twp | 1,506 | 1,117 | 85.0% | 8.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% | $65k | 21.7% | 15.3% | 22.8% | 80.0% | 18.1% | 5.8% |
| Nashville Twp | 225 | 164 | 95.9% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | $89k | 24.6% | 15.3% | 22.1% | 82.1% | 3.9% | 0.7% |
| Northrop | 2 | 1 | 96.3% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $87k | 17.9% | 11.2% | 25.6% | 88.2% | 9.8% | 3.2% |
| Ormsby | 0 | 0 | 96.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $88k | 24.2% | 16.7% | 22.0% | 80.0% | 4.1% | 0.0% |
| Pleasant Prairie Twp | 278 | 207 | 94.1% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% | $101k | 30.1% | 18.2% | 20.7% | 90.0% | 5.8% | 2.4% |
| Rolling Green Twp | 1,161 | 905 | 86.7% | 8.7% | 0.9% | 0.3% | $69k | 35.1% | 13.1% | 28.0% | 69.7% | 10.0% | 5.9% |
| Rutland Twp | 939 | 726 | 90.3% | 6.7% | 1.0% | 0.0% | $56k | 12.9% | 13.1% | 24.8% | 66.8% | 18.8% | 3.1% |
| Sherburn | 134 | 99 | 86.1% | 7.0% | 1.6% | 0.7% | $62k | 21.1% | 15.5% | 25.5% | 78.9% | 20.7% | 3.2% |
| Silver Lake Twp | 308 | 235 | 97.3% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.1% | $86k | 25.1% | 18.8% | 21.3% | 79.8% | 6.6% | 0.4% |
| Tenhassen Twp | 302 | 231 | 97.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.1% | $86k | 24.9% | 18.8% | 21.4% | 79.5% | 6.7% | 0.3% |
| Trimont | 112 | 90 | 84.9% | 14.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | $50k | 23.2% | 23.4% | 32.0% | 68.0% | 14.5% | 8.5% |
| Truman | 311 | 220 | 93.5% | 4.8% | 0.1% | 0.2% | $61k | 21.5% | 24.7% | 17.6% | 64.5% | 10.5% | 1.6% |
| Waverly Twp | 227 | 165 | 95.9% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | $89k | 24.7% | 15.3% | 22.1% | 82.1% | 3.9% | 0.7% |
| Welcome | 344 | 257 | 75.5% | 16.3% | 0.0% | 1.2% | $51k | 17.5% | 12.7% | 15.4% | 77.4% | 18.0% | 16.7% |
| Westford Twp | 1,117 | 792 | 94.0% | 4.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | $66k | 22.1% | 22.9% | 18.4% | 67.6% | 9.3% | 1.4% |