Utah's 4th Congressional District: Millard precincts
Precinct results
"(part)" marks a precinct only partly inside this district; its full vote is shown.
| Precinct | 2024 President | 2022 U.S. Senate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margin | Votes | Margin | Votes | |
| Abraham 14 | R+81.7 | 93 | - | - |
| Delta 17 | R+75.8 | 858 | - | - |
| Delta 18 | R+76.5 | 930 | - | - |
| Deseret-Oasis 5 | R+84.1 | 383 | - | - |
| Fillmore 1 | R+71.0 | 756 | - | - |
| Fillmore 2 | R+72.2 | 490 | - | - |
| Flowell 25 | R+76.6 | 145 | - | - |
| Garrison 16 | R+84.4 | 64 | - | - |
| Hinckley 11 | R+76.7 | 344 | - | - |
| Holden 8 | R+72.4 | 319 | - | - |
| Kanosh 4 | R+71.3 | 390 | - | - |
| Leamington 7 | R+75.0 | 156 | - | - |
| Lynndyl 19 | R+50.0 | 84 | - | - |
| Meadow 3 | R+79.2 | 240 | - | - |
| Oak City 6 | R+80.8 | 485 | - | - |
| Scipio 9 | R+72.4 | 232 | - | - |
| Sutherland 20 | R+83.3 | 418 | - | - |
2024 President (Kamala D. Harris / Tim Walz vs. Donald J. Trump / Jd Vance). Source: Utah Lieutenant Governor, Elections Office, official election results (Enhanced Voting media export, by county). Official, Utah Lieutenant Governor, Elections Office ENR media export (created 2025-11-04T18:27:17.647083Z, post-certification).
2022 U.S. Senate ( vs. Mike Lee). Source: Utah Lieutenant Governor, 2022 General Election State Canvass (scanned). Certified, Utah State Board of Canvassers, 2022 General Election State Canvass (signed Nov 28 2022; image PDF, county figures transcribed and column-checked against canvass totals).
Utah 2022 U.S. Senate: there was no Democratic nominee (Evan McMullin ran as an independent), so the 2022 layer shows Republican margin over the Democratic column only and reads as all Republican.
Precinct demographics
Demographics are Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2020-2024 5-year estimates for block groups, assigned to precincts by area share. They describe the resident population, not registered or likely voters, and include non-citizens. ACS margins of error are not shown; small precincts carry large error. Area weighting assumes people are spread evenly within each block group, so large rural precincts are the least reliable. Median income is a household-weighted average of block-group medians, an approximation.
| Precinct | Population | Voting-age pop. | % White non-Hisp. | % Hispanic | % Black | % Asian | Median income* | % Bachelor's+ | % 18-29 (of adults) | % 65+ | % Homeowners | % Below poverty | % Spanish at home (adults) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14AB14:1 | 126 | 94 | 97.9% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $74k | 27.3% | 14.8% | 25.8% | 81.6% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| 14DE17:1 | 1,366 | 911 | 86.3% | 8.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $88k | 26.7% | 17.2% | 11.1% | 94.1% | 10.7% | 12.6% |
| 14DE17:2 | 764 | 509 | 86.5% | 8.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $88k | 26.8% | 17.0% | 11.0% | 94.4% | 10.7% | 12.5% |
| 14DE18:1 | 1,206 | 879 | 65.0% | 28.9% | 0.4% | 2.9% | $72k | 22.6% | 28.8% | 16.8% | 67.5% | 7.4% | 25.7% |
| 14DE18:2 | 737 | 545 | 60.3% | 34.7% | 0.6% | 2.8% | $70k | 23.3% | 31.8% | 17.0% | 63.0% | 8.5% | 31.8% |
| 14DO5:1 | 2,121 | 1,506 | 92.8% | 4.6% | 0.0% | 0.1% | $66k | 23.3% | 20.3% | 19.6% | 86.8% | 3.5% | 2.5% |
| 14FIL1:1 | 376 | 281 | 84.4% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 11.6% | $79k | 28.3% | 24.6% | 19.2% | 79.2% | 4.1% | 2.7% |
| 14FIL1:2 | 676 | 344 | 59.8% | 34.1% | 0.0% | 4.1% | $63k | 20.2% | 19.5% | 8.8% | 66.9% | 16.5% | 10.5% |
| 14FIL2:1 | 409 | 305 | 85.1% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 10.3% | $77k | 27.8% | 23.4% | 19.7% | 80.9% | 4.5% | 3.0% |
| 14FIL2:2 | 676 | 341 | 59.4% | 34.7% | 0.0% | 4.0% | $63k | 20.0% | 19.4% | 8.6% | 66.6% | 16.7% | 10.7% |
| 14FO25:1 | 51 | 37 | 90.5% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 0.1% | $63k | 24.3% | 13.8% | 23.1% | 92.2% | 7.2% | 5.4% |
| 14GA16:1 | 527 | 395 | 97.9% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $74k | 27.3% | 14.8% | 25.8% | 81.6% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| 14HLD8:1 | 934 | 681 | 89.6% | 6.1% | 0.0% | 1.1% | $74k | 25.5% | 17.0% | 22.3% | 88.3% | 6.5% | 5.3% |
| 14HLD8:2 | 2 | 1 | 87.8% | 8.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $74k | 23.5% | 19.6% | 22.3% | 86.2% | 5.9% | 5.6% |
| 14HN11:1 | 496 | 353 | 70.3% | 23.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $72k | 16.7% | 32.3% | 13.1% | 68.0% | 7.6% | 18.4% |
| 14HN11:2 | 199 | 141 | 63.7% | 27.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $73k | 14.6% | 35.3% | 11.1% | 63.8% | 9.4% | 23.1% |
| 14KAN4:1 | 270 | 196 | 90.1% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 1.2% | $65k | 24.9% | 14.9% | 22.6% | 91.0% | 6.9% | 5.1% |
| 14KAN4:2 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $62k | 25.6% | 14.6% | 22.7% | 91.7% | 7.6% | 6.2% |
| 14LEA7:1 | 124 | 85 | 94.0% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | $73k | 28.5% | 10.7% | 23.4% | 94.5% | 7.8% | 5.5% |
| 14LEA7:2 | 5 | 3 | 94.0% | 4.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | $73k | 28.4% | 10.7% | 23.4% | 94.4% | 7.9% | 5.5% |
| 14LY19:1 | 290 | 197 | 94.0% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | $73k | 28.5% | 10.7% | 23.4% | 94.5% | 7.8% | 5.5% |
| 14LY19:2 | 10 | 6 | 94.0% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | $73k | 28.4% | 10.7% | 23.3% | 94.7% | 7.8% | 5.5% |
| 14MEA3:1 | 410 | 306 | 84.9% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 10.7% | $77k | 28.0% | 23.7% | 19.6% | 80.5% | 4.4% | 2.9% |
| 14MEA3:2 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% | 3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $63k | 25.0% | 12.5% | 23.6% | 90.0% | 7.3% | 5.0% |
| 14OAK6:1 | 462 | 314 | 94.0% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | $73k | 28.5% | 10.8% | 23.3% | 94.5% | 7.8% | 5.4% |
| 14OAK6:2 | 3 | 2 | 93.9% | 4.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | $73k | 28.3% | 10.6% | 23.3% | 94.5% | 7.8% | 5.5% |
| 14SCP9:1 | 641 | 479 | 87.7% | 6.7% | 0.0% | 2.1% | $75k | 24.7% | 19.6% | 21.7% | 85.7% | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| 14SCP9:2 | 4 | 3 | 87.6% | 7.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | $74k | 23.4% | 19.3% | 22.0% | 86.4% | 6.0% | 5.5% |
| 14SU20:1 | 387 | 270 | 77.4% | 16.9% | 0.0% | 0.1% | $76k | 20.9% | 24.7% | 15.3% | 78.2% | 8.8% | 15.5% |